Variation Orders are a common and recurring phenomenon in governmental projects in all countries all around the world. In the variation orders, there is no "optimal solution", but the clients are always trying to get as close to the "optimality" as possible. Most of the previous studies in the field of variation orders in Jordan studied the reasons leading to these changes and/or the effects of these changes, there is a lack of comparison between Jordan with other countries that are more developed in this field. The research aims to develop a framework that limits changes and their high values and shortens the time required to complete projects, as well as to submit proposals for amending the regulating legislation or reducing the conflict between laws to regulate the implementation of these changes. To achieve the objectives of the research, mixed research type (qualitative and quantitative) was used, the quantitative type was used for data collected from archival data from the Ministry of Public Works- which represent the executive authority to most of governmental projects- for previous projects, while the qualitative type was used for a compare between Jordanian legislation and legislation in neighboring countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Dubai law) and to show the gap in the Jordanian legislation, then formulating interview questions and conducting interviews with experts in this field (construction and law field), which include most of the parties related to the variation in an attempt to amend the current framework and submit a proposal to amend the regulations for variation orders. This framework can contribute to avoiding changes or how to solve them or reduce its effects in the field of construction projects The advantage of the proposed legislative framework is that any project must be subjected to a preliminary review before bid assignment. the designs must review and ensured that they are in conformity with reality and away from vague and illogical work. in addition to ensure that allocations are reserved for each project within the budget of the competent department. The amended framework defines the work of changes and sets an upper limit for these changes, contrary to what is currently in effect, in addition to that this framework includes the best procedural method for dealing with changes and managing them during the stage of their implementation in order to control and reduce the enormous values of change orders. Significant delays in these projects. In addition to studying the actual needs of the owner before bidding and reviewing the designs before submitting the contractor's bid, in addition to that, a unit specialized in change orders was established in each governmental entity concerned with bids to follow up on changes and their procedures within its automated programs. Some amendments to the current regulations must be taken into account to remove existing contradictions, such as the role of the Prime Minister, as well reviewing the role of the competent authority in approving the changes, and reviewing the engineer's authority to issue the change order to give engineering services (for himself).